While not all animal studies involve subjecting the test subject to pain or other forms of torture, footage can be found that indicates the animal welfare act by itself is not enough of a deterrent for the researchers who are less concerned about ethical standards. The last decade has seen an 8% rise in the number of animal procedures carried out in britain although over 97% of animal research is carried out using mice, rats, birds and fish, much of the. It's difficult to know exactly how many animals will be affected by this ban, as companies do not advertise their use of animal testing and results are often unpublished. Animal tests proceed only when animal suffering is worth it the potential human benefits of a particular animal test are typically weighed against the harms that it will entail for animals scientists are not wanton in inflicting tests on animals. Such tests have typically proven to be cheaper, quicker, and better at predicting human reactions than the antiquated animal tests first developed 70 years ago.
Although the us food and drug administration does not require animal safety testing for cosmetics—a category that includes skin cream, perfume, makeup and shampoo—animal tests are still used. Opponents often say that we have moved beyond the need to perform in-humane and cruel tests products on animals - test tube tests on cell lines or latter stage human testing should be sufficient to ensure safet y is this stance correct or does it put the welfare of animals above a demonstrated human need. Animals should not be exploited by people and they should have the same rights as humans this is the second opinion: humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. The topic of whether animal testing should be banned is highly debatable and it draws out mixed reactions from people who support or oppose this activity however, a careful study of this subject reveals that claims supporting the merit of animal testing holds the least amount of credibility.
1/ animal testing is unreliable my point is the statistic pro presented does not back up his argument of unreliability i will repeat my counter example in round 1 here: 1000 drugs need to go through two tests 900 fail the first test and only 100 are allowed to take the second test, then 92 fail and only 8 pass. Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results. Animal testing is a cost effective way for companies to test their products and if that company makes a lot of money on these products, why should they stop it is all about the bottom line if you are doing something and it is making a lot of money, it is much easier to justify the seedier aspects of what is being done. There are many non-animal test methods that can be used in place of animal testing not only are these non-animal tests more humane, they also have the potential to be cheaper, faster, and more relevant to humans.
No it's not right to kill and make them suffer for us animals have emotions they have thoughts, ideas, feelings they also suffer if we just kill and make them suffer, we are taking the freedom and the life of other animals to protect the animal's liberty and life we should ban animal testing. In conclusion,animal tests have both beneficial and detrimental effects,but these tests should not be bannedwe should continue to conduct these tests by minimizing the suffering of laboratory animals,and treating our fellow creatures as mercifully as possible to demonstrate our humanity. Animal testing should be banned creatures may be being tortured and killed for the shampoo you use, food you eat, the makeup you may wearing, the cleaner used in your home, or medication you may take millions of animals a year are subject to being imprisoned and having terrible procedures done.
Animal testing should not be banned from when you are a baby to when you are an adult animal testing is used in your everyday products from the pampers you put on as a baby and the johnson and johnson you are washed with. Not only do the animals die in research, but also abused during the entire process all kinds of animals, including mice, birds, rats, fish, frogs, dogs, monkeys, rabbits, guinea pigs, and hamsters are subject to cruel experimentation in the name of science. I believe that animals in any type of cavity should be protected from mistreatment urban expansion, natural resource shortages, and industrial farming are destroying wild habitats. I believe that animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, not very reliable, inaccurate, and is proved to be unnecessary animal testing is arrogant and incredibly cruel like us, animals can feel pain and fear, but also excitement and satisfaction. Dangerous animal testing vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide.
Animal testing is a hot button issue with a multitude of opinions on each side it's an industry where there are entire companies dedicated to the breeding of animals used for experimental purposes. Should animals be banned in the circus history of animals in circus in ancient rome , the circus was a construction for the display of chariot and horse races, equestrian shows and exhibition of trained animals, among other presentations, such as gladiatorial fights. Animal experimentation has been a commonly debated subject for many years, is it cruelty or science about 14 million animals die each year from animal testing. Although most countries do not specifically require animal testing, just as canada doesn't, they do require that a product be safe, which often necessitates an animal test as of 2009, the european union has outlawed many types of animal tests in cosmetic production, and the practice may be completely prohibited by 2013.
All the reasons why zoos should be banned and this basic common sense tells me one thing when it comes to the captivity of wild animals: it's probably not something we should be doing. In conclusion, i am of the opinion, on balance, that the benefits do not outweigh the disadvantages, and testing on animals should not continue although it may improve the lives of humans, it is not fair that animals should suffer in order to achieve this.
We no longer need to test cosmetics on animals and many countries, including the european union, have banned the use of cosmetic ingredients tested on animals, mr wyatt said. I believe animal testing should be stopped its not only cruel but also inhumane in my opinion how can we as humans take away the life of innocent animals for out own benefit, there are other ways to get tests done.